Zahed Zahedani等[12]研究了标准方丝弓矫治器和直丝弓矫治器的牙根吸收情况,发现直丝弓矫治器治疗后的牙根吸收量多于标准方丝弓矫治器,差异具有统计学意义。原因归纳于MBT直丝弓矫治器轴倾度预成于托槽内从而使牙根有了更多的移动。而Liu等[13]对传统托槽与自锁托槽在拔牙病例中牙根吸收做了对比研究,得出结论使用传统托槽与自锁托槽在拔牙病例的矫治中无统计学意义差异。Evangelia等[14]对24例尖牙埋伏阻生患者与24例对照组无尖牙埋伏阻生的牙根吸收进行了研究,虽然尖牙埋伏阻生组的牙根吸收比对照组平均多吸收了0.38 mm,但是无统计学意义,这个结果说明了埋伏尖牙正畸治疗中诱发牙根吸收的证据是不充分的。 本研究还存在一些局限性,只收集了10例患者,主要是因为CBCT在正畸治疗中不是一个常规的检查手段,以后的研究应该有更多的病例去验证之前的研究结果,也应考虑正畸治疗后牙齿移动和牙根吸收与年龄、性别的相关性。另外,本研究只涉及测量了牙根长度的吸收,而牙根侧表面的吸收也存在在正畸治疗的患者中。本研究只对上颌前牙的牙根吸收做了评价,而且只是牙齿关闭间隙后,并未持续到牙齿矫正结束,未来的研究还应该监测正畸治疗结束后以及保持阶段的牙根吸收情况。 本研究结果显示正畸拔牙矫正患者治疗中有一个明显的牙根吸收。本研究证实使用CBCT评价牙根吸收是一个有效而且精确的方法。 参考文献 [1] Brezniak N,Wasserstein A.Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: part 1. Literature review[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1993,103(1):62-66. [2] Iury O C,Ana H.G,Alencar D,et al.Apical root resorption due to orthodontic treatment detected by cone beam computed tomography[J].Angle Orthod,2013,83(2):196-203. [3] Estrela C,Bueno M R,Leles C R,et al.Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis[J].J Endod,2008,34(3):273-279. [4] Kurol J,Owman-Moll P,Lundgren D.Time-related root resorption after application of a controlled continuous orthodontic force[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1996,110(3):303-310. [5] Sameshima G T,Sinclair P M.Predicting and preventing root resorption: part I, diagnostic factors[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2001,119(5):505-510. [6] Blake M,Woodside D G,Pharoah M J.A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the edgewise and speed appliances[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1995,108(1):76-84. [7] Sameshima G T,Sinclair P M.Predicting and preventing root resorption: part II, treatment factors[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2001,119(1):511-515. [8] Baumrind S,Korn E L,Boyd R L.Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated adults[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1996,110(3):311-320. [9] Dimitrio M,Henrik L,Ken H.Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months and at the end of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances[J].Angle Orthod,2013,83(3):389-393. [10] Artun J, Smale I,Behbehani F,et al.Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy[J].Angle Orthod,2005,75(6):919-926. [11] Mohandesan H,Ravanmehr H,Valaei N.A radiographic analysis of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors during active orthodontic treatment[J].Eur J Orthod,2007,29(2):134-139. [12] Zahed Zahedani S M,Oshagh M,Momeni D S.Roeinpeikar SMM: a comparison of apical root resorption in incisors after fixed orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise and straight wire (MBT) method[J].J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci,2013,14(3):103-110. [13] Liu X Q,Sun X L,Yang Q,et al.Comparative study on the apical root resorption between self-ligating and conventional brackets in extraction patients[J].Shanghai Journal of Stomatology,2012,21(4):460-465. [14] Evangelia L,Nikolaos P,Padhraig S.Fleming and maria mavragani:a comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with surgical exposure and traction of maxillary impacted canines versus that without impactions[J].Eur J Ortho,2014,16(6):2-8. [15] David N,Donald R,Timmons K,et al.Long-term evaluation of root resorption occurring during othodontic treatment[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1989,96(1):43-46.
|